Tuesday, March 29, 2011

FHCO: Your Future in the Bible (Part 2)

Future Hope Conference Online
Your Future in the:
Bible - Tribulation - Rapture - Millennial Kingdom - Heaven - Q&A

Steve HowellSteve Howell
Adult Education Minister
Tonganoxie Christian Church


We don't have the time to debate the truth of the Bible from every single angle, including all the epistemology and philosophical discussions out there. There never is enough time in the world to get into everything about what is truth. But, we do have time to run through some very practical, everyday, common sense, tests of truth. These are some things that you use everyday in your life, things that you do all the time, and they serve you well. So, let's go through some of these tests of truth and see where you stand when it comes to the Bible.

Let's discover the truth. Are you ready?

Why Past Truth Matters

Let's talk about first things first. How do we know something is true?

First of all, to start we need to consider whether it was true in regards to past events, because past truth matters. If you doubt me, I just want you to ask anybody who ever took this product — cocaine toothache drops.

Cocaine Toothache Drops

Cocaine toothache drops. Great for the kids! This product comes from all the way back in 1885. When we look through advertising from this era, we find out that cocaine actually was used in a lot of different products until about 1914 when it started to be pulled. According to one manufacturer, cocaine could make the coward brave, the silent eloquent, and render the sufferer insensitive to pain. That's great! But, we now know just a little bit more about cocaine. We know that it might not be the best substance for us. It has a lot of dangers to it. It is highly addictive, and it is something that we should not be giving in place of Tylenol.

This past truth is in fact a lie. As such, we can ignore its claims for the present and for the future.

Past truth matters because it carries over. We need to know the truth about past events. If it was true then, it remains true now. And, if it was false then, it remains false now even if they thought it was true before.

With the Bible, this issue is huge, because the Bible is filled with information about past events. It talks about a lot of different things that happened in the past, and so, it raises the question:

Can we trust the Bible's claims about the past?

If so, we will have to take those teachings seriously if they're true. If not, we can safely dismiss the book as just another great piece of literature that really has no bearing on our lives today.

There are a number of different ways to look at the Bible and evaluate those past truth claims. Today, I want to look at three everyday tests of truth we would use, because if it is good enough for the rest of life, it should be good enough for this.

Everyday Tests of Past Truth

Test #1: Do I trust the source?
A) The Source Has Remained Intact

The first truth has to do with the source. I start thinking about the source, and here is the question, here is the test: Do I trust the source?

Now, I've spent very little time in the state of Texas. Most of what I know about Texas and its people comes not from first-hand knowledge, but I hear good things and so I conclude that they are probably true. I believe that Texans love their football. I believe that Dallas is sometimes called the "Big D". I believe that I should be able to get some good barbeque or Tex-Mex somewhere within a one mile radius of wherever I'm standing. I have heard those things. I believe those things and I believe them because somebody told me. People told me these things. Whether these are from friends or whether it is from magazine authors or people who are on TV who have showed them off, I believe these things because people told me.

Now, I don't believe everything that I have ever been told, but I recognize that if the source is trustworthy, then I'm going to accept what they say as truth.

What happens when I apply this test to the Bible? Does it show me that my sources related to the Bible are trustworthy when it comes to the past truth that is out there? And in a word — yes! I find out a lot of different things. I start looking at it, and do you know what? The source has remained intact. If the Bible were a lie, I'd expect it to have been modified somewhere along the way. Instead, when I look at the Bible, I find that the Bible I have is the same as what they had all they way back to when it was originally written.

There are, of course, various English translations that have been produced along the way, with your King James Version and the NIV version and whatever. I personally use the Holman Christian Standard Version. They might read a little bit differently, but the Greek and the Hebrew text from the originals that they are based off of are the same as when they were written. They have remained unaltered.

The process for figuring this out is pretty simple. We know that something that was written way back in ancient history, well, they didn't have Xerox machines to make copies to be passed down. So, to figure out if some Scripture that I am holding today is an accurate representation of what it said way back when, then all I have to do is figure out when this was originally written. I figure out when my earliest copy originated, then next figure our how many copies I have, and finally I cross check it.

For example, Plato the philosopher wrote a lot of stuff between 427 and 347 BC. Of what he wrote way back then, the earliest known copy that we have of his writings comes from around 900 AD. That means there is about 1,200 years of a gap between when he first wrote it and when we can find our earliest copy!

Okay, fair enough, things get destroyed along the way. People lose them, they misfile them, they burn them up, whatever. But, when we find out that there are seven copies of that manuscript which we cross check, we can then look at those and conclude, "Those seem pretty consistent, so we are pretty confident that what we have now is the same thing as Plato wrote back then."

We do that with all the other texts from the ancient world, too. We compare copies of the writings of Caesar, the writings of Aristotle, and many others. Most of these copies have gaps of 500 or more years from the original writing to the copies preserved today. We still have those handful of copies that we look at and can compare with to conclude, "Yes, that is trustworthy."

When we look at the Bible, we know the books and letters of the New Testament were written between 50-100 AD. Our earliest copies date back to 130 AD. The gap is less than 100 years. On top of the number of complete copies that we have to cross check, there are also over 24,000 copies or fragments of copies that we have in which we can cross-check as well. That is pretty cool! That is pretty good.

With evidence like that, it leaves me no doubt that what we have in the Bible has stayed intact. The source itself has remained intact over these hundreds of years. That gives me hope that helps me understand that I can trust the Bible as THE source.

[More on why we can trust the Bible as THE source from God in the next part.]


Billy said...

This article on whether or not the Bible is true would seem to me to have no relevance to a Chrstian.

If you are a Christian then you should believe the Bible is true, end of story, period.

If you don't believe the Bible is true then you are not a Christian and I would say yes, this article is for YOU, not me.

Nathan Jones said...

I should do a poll on whether the Bible is truly God's inerrant word. Sadly for Christianity today, the results would not shine too well on the present Laodician state of the Church.

hartdawg said...

and consider this Billy, I know the Bible is true but I had to defend the faith and Bible many times. these articles have proven to be a good help for me in defending the faith. (1 Peter 3:15)

Rodney said...

Sounds like a wonderful conference!

Billy said...


Don't get me wrong. I know there is value to this. I'm just saying for TRUE BELIEVERS we don't OURSELVES need convincing. I don't need any evidence, argument, historical proof, etc. I just believe.

hartdawg said...

Billy...I did get you wrong. I hear you loud and clear.

Nathan Jones said...

This new archaeological find could be for the New Testament what the Dead Sea Scrolls were forthe Old Testament, and further confirmaton of our faith in God's Word.