Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Celebrating 400 Years of the KJV: Earlier Translations

Dr. David R. ReaganPDFBy Dr. David R. Reagan

The King James Version of the Bible was published 400 years ago in 1611, and it served the English-speaking world very well during the 250 years of its peak acceptance (1700 to 1950).

It was not really a new and fresh translation of the Scriptures. Rather, it was primarily a revision of previously existing translations. And for that reason, it cannot be fully appreciated apart from a history of the English translations of the Bible.

The Latin Vulgate

The first point that needs to be made clear is that the Bible used in the Western world for almost 1200 years prior to the King James Version was the Latin Vulgate (vulgate means the Latin that was commonly spoken).1 This translation was produced between 382 and 405 A.D. by Eusebius Hieronymus, better known as St. Jerome (c. 347-420 A.D.).2 He worked from Greek texts to produce his New Testament translation. When translating the Old Testament he resorted to Hebrew texts and is generally regarded as the first to do so. All previous translations of the Old Testament had been based on the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures which was produced in the 3rd Century B.C.3

St. Jerome

By the time of the King James Version, Latin had ceased to be the common language of peoples in Western Europe. It was understood primarily by the educated, and Latin Bibles were confined to libraries and churches. The average person was illiterate and had little knowledge of the Bible. Basically, all they knew about Christianity is what the Roman Church taught them, and much of that was thoroughly unbiblical.

The Wycliffe Bible

The story of English translations begins in the 14th Century with an Oxford professor and theologian by the name of John Wycliffe (c. 1328-1384).4 He was a dissident Catholic who produced hand-written translations of the Scriptures in English, all of which were translated from the Latin Vulgate. Here is a sample of his translation in 1380 of John 3:16 —

For god loued so the world; that he gaf his oon bigetun sone, that eche man that bileueth in him perisch not; but haue euerlastynge liif.5

Wycliffe's efforts to get the Scriptures into the language of the English-speaking peoples enraged the Vatican. The Church fought against the Bible being translated into vernacular languages for fear it would undermine unbiblical traditions like indulgences. The rage of the Vatican was so great, that 40 years after Wycliffe had died, the Pope ordered that his bones be dug up, crushed, and scattered in a river.6 The opposition of the Church throughout this period was, in fact, so virulent that in 1517 seven people were ordered to be burned at the stake for teaching their children to say the Lord's Prayer in English rather than in Latin.7

Johannes Gutenberg

In the midst of all this struggle to get the Bible into the languages of the people, a profound event occurred that had to represent the perfect timing of God. A German printer and publisher, Johannes Gutenberg (c. 1398-1468), invented a printing press with movable type.8 Significantly, the first thing he printed was a copy of the Latin Vulgate Bible.

Looking back on this development today, it is obvious that God was preparing the way to get His Word into the hands of the common people.

William Tyndale

The next key individual in the effort to produce an English Bible was a remarkable man named William Tyndale (c. 1494- 1536).9 In fact, he ultimately proved to be the most important person in the whole process, as we shall see.

Tyndale was a genius who was fluent in eight languages. He was the leading scholar of Greek at Cambridge University when he decided to translate the New Testament into English. When he could not get the approval of the Church for his project, he moved to the Continent and took up residence in Germany where he finished his translation in 1525. Four years later he began translating the Old Testament.

Tyndale's translations were the first in English to be based directly on Greek and Hebrew texts. His English New Testament was the first to be printed, making it available for widespread distribution. Copies were smuggled into England, resulting in Tyndale being declared a heretic. He further enraged English authorities when he wrote and published an attack in 1530 on King Henry VIII's divorce.

In 1535 Tyndale was betrayed by a friend and arrested in Brussels, Belgium, where he was imprisoned for a year before he was tried for heresy and then was strangled and burned at the stake. His last words were, "Lord! Open the King of England's eyes." Within four years his prayer was answered when the King ordered four translations of the Bible to be published in English, all of which were based on Tyndale's work.10

The Coverdale Bible

During the year Tyndale was imprisoned, two of his disciples completed translating the Old Testament into English. They were Myles Coverdale (c. 1488-1569) and John Rogers (c. 1500-1555). Although Tyndale has based his translation of the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament) on Hebrew texts, Coverdale and Rogers translated from Martin Luther's German text (completed in 1534) and the Latin Vulgate.

Coverdale and Rogers took what they had done and combined it with Tyndale's complete New Testament and his partial Old Testament translations to produce what came to be called the Coverdale Bible.11 It was published in 1535.

The Great Bible

Meanwhile, King Henry VIII had broken with Rome in 1534 over his divorce of Catherine of Aragon, and he was anxious to provide an official Bible for his new Anglican Church. Accordingly, the Archbishop of Canterbury hired Myles Coverdale for the task, and he produced in 1539 what came to be known as the Great Bible.12 Its name was based on its size since it measured over 14 inches in height.

This Bible was the first "authorized edition" to be published in England. The King ordered that it be distributed to every church and chained to each pulpit. He also ordered that a reader be provided so that the illiterate could hear the Word of God.13

The Matthew-Tyndale Bible

Coverdale's collaborator on the Coverdale Bible, John Rogers, who operated under the pseudonym, Thomas Matthew, continued working on the Old Testament, determined to produce an English text based solely on Hebrew sources. He combined his work with the New Testament produced by Tyndale and published the Matthew-Tyndale Bible in 1549.

This was the first English language Bible to be based entirely on Hebrew and Greek texts.

Four years later, in 1553, the eldest daughter of King Henry VIII ascended the throne determined to restore England to Roman Catholicism. She was crowned Queen Mary I, and she immediately launched a severe religious persecution which ultimately resulted in almost 300 dissenters being burned at the stake, including John Rogers.14 "Bloody Mary's" attack on the Reformers prompted a mass exodus to Europe.

The Geneva Bible

Many of those who fled Mary's fury went to Geneva, Switzerland where John Calvin granted them asylum. There they began working on a new English translation. William Wittingham (c. 1524-1579) headed up the effort and oversaw the work of a skilled team of translators and biblical scholars which included Myles Coverdale.

In 1560 they produced the Geneva Bible which became one of the most historically significant translations of the Bible into English.15 It served as the primary Bible of the Protestant Reformation Movement and was the Bible used by William Shakespeare, Oliver Cromwell, John Milton, John Knox, John Donne, and John Bunyan. It was the first Bible to be brought to America, being transported across the ocean on the Mayflower.

The text of the Bible was not much different from the English versions that preceded it. In fact, more than 85% of the language came from Tyndale. What set it apart was its format and the study aids that were incorporated into it:

  • It was the first English Bible with text that was divided into numbered verses.
  • Extensive cross-referencing of verses was supplied.
  • Each book was preceded with a summary introduction.
  • Visual aids like maps, tables, and woodcut illustrations were added.
  • It contained topical and name indexes.
  • It featured an elaborate system of marginal notes designed to explain the meanings of verses.

Because of all these features, the Geneva Bible has often been referred to as the first study Bible. It was enormously popular, and it quickly replaced all other Bibles. Its popularity continued for decades after the King James Version was released in 1611.

The Bishop's Bible

But the Geneva Bible was not popular among the rulers of England. Queen Mary had been succeeded by her sister, Elizabeth I, who returned England to the Protestant fold, but Elizabeth was a devout believer in the Divine Right of Kings, and the marginal notes of the Geneva Bible were strongly opposed to both monarchy and the institutional church. This led to the production in 1568 of a new authorized Bible called the Bishop's Bible, which was a revision of the Great Bible of 1539. The Bishop's Bible was never able to gain much acceptance among the people.16

The Douay-Rheims Bible

Meanwhile, the Roman Catholic Church had decided to give up its resistance to translations. Realizing they had lost the battle, they decided that if the Bible was going to be available in English, they might as well produce an official Catholic version.

They used the inaccurate Latin Vulgate as their source text, and in 1589 they published what was called the Douay-Rheims Bible.17 The New Testament was published in 1582. The Old Testament was completed over 30 years later in 1610. This version contained notes that were very polemical in nature, designed to counter the claims of the Protestant Reformation.

In the next segment, we'll continue celebrating 400 years of the King James Bible by looking at the development and popularity of this version.


1) Wikipedia, "Vulgate," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgate.

2) Wikipedia, "Jerome," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome.

3) Wikipedia, "Septuagint," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint.

4) Wikipedia, "John Wycliffe," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wycliffe.

5) John L. Jeffcoat III, "English Bible History," www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history, page 10.

6) Wikipedia, "John Wycliffe," page 13.

7) Jeffcoat, "English Bible History," pages 1-2.

8) Wikipedia, "Johannes Gutenberg," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Gutenberg.

9) Wikipedia, "William Tyndale," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tyndale.

10) Ibid., page 4.

11) Widipedia, "Coverdale Bible," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverdale_Bible.

12) Wikipedia, "Great Bible," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Bible.

13) Jeffcoat, "English Bible History," page 4.

14) Wikipedia, "Mary I of England," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_I_of_England.

15) Wikipedia, "Geneva Bible," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Bible.

16) Jeffcoat, "English Bible History," page 6.

17) Wikipedia, "Douay-Rheims Bible," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douay%E2%80%93Rheims_Bible.


Child of God said...

This is a very informative post, thank you. I am looking forward to reading your next one. :)


Anonymous said...

I have read this 10 times today and plan on reading it everyday.

Laura said...

Wikipedia is a very very VERY unreliable source of information. If you want your articles to be credible, sir, I highly recommend basing them on credible sources.

If you quote Wikipedia in reputable academic circles, you will be laughed out of the room!

Nathan Jones said...

LOL, Laura, and encyclopedia's are any better? Every source has to be looked at with an eye of discernment as you know, and very much cross referenced.

I attended the 400 year celebration display room at the NRB and everything they taught about the history of the KJV reflects what's above. I even got to read an original KJV and saw the typo in Esther that called her a "he".

Laura said...

No laughing matter, Nathan. As an editor for a textbook publishing company, I assure that Wikipedia is the least of the least reliable. We don't accept Wikipedia as a reliable source, and when you quote them as such, you make yourself look bad.

It's not just my opinion--it's well known in any credible research industry. And of course, all facts have to be verified by more than one source--just don't quote Wikipedia (which can be edited by ANYBODY) as one of your sources.

I'm merely pointing out that quoting them makes you look less credible, and I (and others) will definitely take any article based off Wikipedia info with a huge grain of salt. Take it or leave it!

Expected Imminently said...

Hello Nathan

Tad of local info!

William Tyndale was keen to make the Bible readable to the common Plow boys and girls of Gloucestershire and borders in the West Country. OUR accent is detected within his original script including a few ‘rudies’.

Example ‘wer y’ goin’? Oim goin’over ther’! Tis said ye Yankilies, that rolls yer ‘R’s with a drawl; gits it from uz over yer. :-)

P.S. I don't disagree with Laura about 'Wicked-pedia' but this particular Wiki basic info must have been written by one who 'knows his onions'. :)